This is
actually a common procedure. The "plate" coating is
most accurately accomplished using very thin membrane elements (not shell
elements). There is a clear rationale for this:
1) In "blocky" structures the peak stresses will be on the free surface (barring any defects--which of course FEA can't account for).
2) On the free surface the stress tensor devolves to two normal components and one shear (which the membrane element captures nicely).
1) In "blocky" structures the peak stresses will be on the free surface (barring any defects--which of course FEA can't account for).
2) On the free surface the stress tensor devolves to two normal components and one shear (which the membrane element captures nicely).
Actually, when using membrane elements
this is a somewhat standard technique when the surface stresses will be used
for a subsequent fatigue study. The fatigue analysis is only concerned with the
stresses at the surface of the component, so it is convenient (and
computationally efficient) to use only the stresses from the membrane elements.
The membrane elements used are very thin and the stress results do not differ
greatly when compared to the same model run without the surface membrane
element (solid elements only).
No comments:
Post a Comment